Learn how EBSCO Health brings the right knowledge to healthcare decision making and enables best outcomes, including: 1. Traditional evidence-based medicine with systematic reviews cannot scale to current information needs: EBSCO’s 7-step systematic literature surveillance method does. 2. Guidelines are often inconsistent and not comprehensive: DynaMed and Dynamic Health synthesize evidence and guidelines for application across the healthcare continuum. 3. Thresholds for action do not account for patient’s values and preferences: DynaMed Shared Decisions engage patients for many healthcare decisions. 4. Prior Authorization is labor-intensive and disconnected from clinician and patient decision making:  We can do better. 5. Clinical decision support through one-at-a-time decision rules cannot meet the scale needed for medication optimization:  Comprehensive Medication Review can. 6. We do not know how to prioritize among many “right thing to do” choices when there is too much to do:  Defining the Net Benefit for clinical actions can prioritize decisions for individuals and for populations. 7. Interoperability is lacking in communicating healthcare evidence and guidance.  EBMonFHIR extends FHIR solutions to support living systematic reviews and living guidelines. 8. There is a disconnect among regulatory requirements, policy, point of care practice and learning & development within healthcare organizations.  Dynamic Health bridges the gap to assure quality and compliance.